Simple query boolean expressions: allow checking without true/false

By Kilian Hekhuis on 7 Mar 2014
Normal expressions allow booleans to be evaluated without comparison, and the not operator, e.g.:
if(not myBool, "hello", "hi")
In simple query expressions however, we need to explicitly check against True or False, and the not operator is not allowed:
Entity.Attribute = False
I'd consider that bad coding style in a normal expression. Why can't we use "proper" boolean expressions in simple queries?
Paulo Zacarias10 Aug (8 days ago)

The idea here is to let the developer use only the boolean attribute name when setting a filter on an aggregate with it, instead of the attribute name plus the condition (=true or =false).

Please see the attached pictures as an example.

Merged from 'Disable the mandatory condition (=true / =false) when setting a filter on an aggregate with a boolean attribute.' (idea created on 2017-08-10 10:54:37 by Paulo Zacarias), on 2017-08-11 15:15:17 by Justin James