Agreed. When we  started looking at BPT we discovered the training materials were lacking in comparison to the other materials

I felt exactly the same as you Sam.

Thank you Shubh

Thank you for your support of this idea. We hope that it will soon be attended to, as many have the opinion that BPT is a very powerful tool, which needs to be well understood, and we have some lack of information and training.

Hi all!

This Idea currently has almost comments with only the content "+1" (which is not very useful for the discussion of the Idea).

All that make comments "+1" know that there is a "Like" link in the Idea that you can use to like the Idea, right?

If you like the Idea then please use it instead of polluting the Idea's topic with comments with just "+1" on lit.

But I really appreciated that you collaborated in the discussion of the idea, sharing your opinion about the need for it, and that other topics related to the idea could contribute.

Thank you all for your support.

+1 Agree and liked. 

BPT is not straight forword. It need more training materials with more scenarios, Yesterday when I was writing review on G2, there also I mentioned this.

We need more scenario inclusive training where we can understand when to use BPT if we can do the same with logic implementation.

+1 Agreed, Need more training materials on BPT, like exercises which may help to get familiar with BPT and its best practices