Dear all,The AD has a chart with the overall technical debt trend for all applications within Outsystems factory, however should be very interesting to have something similar for each application.Something like:Best regards,João Paulo Pires

When recovering deleted code or working with another person in the same app, during merge and publish it would be very helpful to have an option to 'Select All' for the versions we want, instead of selecting them one by one.

I suggest that to truly win 2026 Outsystems should position Service Studio not as a tool for developers but as a" command center for AI Agents ." The goal should be to make the one-click publish feel like a one-click Delegate, where the platform handles the complexity and the human provides the strategic "vibe."

It would be great if I could expand an assignment to some structure like is already possible for parameters of an action.

There is a great subdomain "charts.outsystems.com" that explains how the charts can be customized. However, I think it is missing some crucial information. For example, there is the following page that explains different chart types and how to implement them: https://charts.outsystems.com/samples/chart-with-multiple-chart-types There is a warning there implying that it is not possible to do a "step line chart" with the config options of the chart block (see attachment): "Currently, it's possible to convert any series to the following types: Line, LineSpline, Area, AreaSpline, Column, Bar and Pie." In reality, it is actually possible to do this with addon extensibility configurations; i.e. with a certain client action ( SetHighchartsSeriesConfigs ) from the Charts library, as partly explained in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzNnX7oqhNY It would be great if such information is also added to the https://charts.outsystems.com/ subdomain.

The accelerator should allow developers to easily configure the behavior of the Delete action, providing the option to choose between hard delete and soft delete based on project requirements. This enhancement would: Improve data integrity: Prevent accidental data loss by allowing for easy recovery of "deleted" records. Enhance auditing capabilities: Maintain a historical record of deleted entities for analysis and compliance purposes. Increase flexibility: Provide developers with the choice of deletion behavior based on project needs. Reduce development effort: Eliminate the need to manually implement soft delete logic for each entity. Additionally for the existing feature, enhance the OutSystems Entity Action Wrappers Accelerator to include a built-in option for soft delete. By default, the generated Delete action should mark the entity's 'IsActive' flag as 'False' instead of performing a hard delete. This will improve data integrity and provide greater flexibility for data recovery and auditing purposes. By incorporating this feature, OutSystems can further streamline the development process and provide developers with more robust and flexible data management capabilities.

When we do a merge with two OML, would be useful to have a search box to filter whats been shows in Compare and Merge box.

While using some tools like IcoMoon to extend the icon collection to fit more with my project theme, I face an issue with dual color icons. I am talking about the icons that is defacto mono color, but some paths has opacity, to apply shadow or set background color for example. This icons inherit a single color form its parent, or by applied color using classes, like normal icons. Some icons may be rendered with many paths. If the icon need 1 or 2 paths, it can be applied with pseudo elements, "::before" and "::after". Icon: delete-01 Icon: delete-02 However, if it need more than 2 paths, then OutSystems' icon widget cannot be used. Instead I uses "HTML Element" and add "span" elements in it. Icon: delete-03 So it would be easier if the Icon widget detects the number of needed paths by it self, or has a lot of paths appended in it to support a wider range of icons in it.

It would be helpful to be able to create multiple plans and schedule when they are being published or add them to a publishing queue.Our company has a large number of applications and we are running into the situation where we have so many applications its taking a long time to publish.  If we can split up the applications being published and schedule it to run in off-hours it would improve performance.Another case is we have multiple developers trying to publish to the same environment. Sometimes we forget to go back so the QA spends time waiting for all of the changes to be published for testing.

Introduce a unique icon for private actions in OutSystems to visually distinguish them from public actions. This improves clarity, reduces accidental misuse and supports better encapsulation of logic. A key benefit is that it eliminates the need to reorganize code into folders or rename actions. Observation: I could not find this exact idea already proposed. If anyone knows, please let me know. Attached a example.