I find it very odd that the exams contain lots of information not covered in the training material.I'm well aware that this information in contained within the documentation, however reading through pages and pages of text does not suit everyone's learning style and can be pretty tedious.I'm also aware that the expectation is that you put into practice what you’ve learned during training prior to sitting the exam, but that doesn't ensure you acquire all the necessary information.It would be far better to have more comprehensive training courses and cover all the required material, as is standard with most exams.As things stand, unless you have the time and inclination to read through all the documentation, whether you know the additional information or not can come down to luck, which is not at all ideal.In addition to that, many of the questions appear to be trying to trick you by using confusing and ambiguous language, and I'm not sure why this is necessary.It would be better if questions were clear and straight forward, so that it tests your knowledge and not your interpretation of their English grammar, which is sometimes lacking, perhaps due to English not being the first language of those writing it.If, for some reason there is really the reason to include ‘trick’ questions (though I can’t think why), then at the very least, the questions need to be unambiguous and grammatically correct, so that they properly test knowledge and don't trip people up through misunderstanding.