It would be very nice to have a check box when deploying from environment to environment which would allow you to remove unused elements in all applications. Similar to how the feature works within Service Studio .I find it very helpful having everything at hand when developing  but once deployed to test or production environments there is no need for the extra baggage.

Context-aware logic suggestions, error fixes, and performance tips using AI. Smart autocomplete for expressions and logic flows.

Hi all,I think that we can have a section of OS Merch (with swagg and stuff) where we can buy all kind of stuff related with Outsystems. Many times I heard people saying that want some cool shirts, mugs or pins and don't mind paying for it :D.Best regards,Ricardo M Pereira

Removing unused references is a great piece of functionality.It is a little blatant in its execution though. It would be nice to be able to view the unused references and then select/unselect the ones you do not want removed yet.As an alternative, in the Manage Dependencies window, show which selected references are not currently used by way of some indicator.The second option might be slighlty easier to implement and also would exist in precisely the place where teh developer is busy making choices about these things.The existing Remove Unused References would then remain as a reference cleanup tool rather than a reference management tool.

It would be great if we could use wildcards in all searches inside Service Studio to help refine searching for something.Example scenarios:Sometimes I want to search for a function but don't know the module it is being called from or the exact name of the function only parts of it.For example a function called GetProductsListFilters and I search for "Product Filters" the search doesn't return any results.So I try to refine my search using "Products Filters" and still returns no result.I end up searching for "Products" or "Filters" and I'm left with a large list to filter through with my eyes.It would be great if I could use a wildcard such as * to help refine my search.So when I search for "Product*filters"  I would have a more refined search that would eventually return a list such as GetProductCategoryFilters, GetProductsListFilters, etc...Another case is that sometimes functions and modules have technical names related to clients specific business language and it's tricky to remember how some of them are written correctly.Since the asterisk wildcard is used for multiple character searching it would be great if one could also filter for single character to help define the search to less results in these cases.Strictly as an example if one was to use the ? wildcard to refine the search for b?ll it would return ball, bell, bill, bull and exclude words such as bankroll.This would also be a great addition to the Application Search and Open from Environment module search.If an application is called Product Core Widgets and I search for "Product Widgets" no results are returned.Same happens with the Open from Environment module search when I want to find a module that I know it's a reactive widgets module and related to products but I am not able to find it using the string "product rcw" to return a list of all modules containing those words. In the present moment even if the module is called Product_RCW, since it has the underscore between the words the search does not return that module.I would find that using wildcards, or even regular expressions in search would benefit for a more productive workflow and help immensely to refine these kind of searches.

The AI Mentor currently offers insights into 'Unused Actions in Modules' and 'Unused Aggregates or SQL Queries.' Likewise, adding a feature to identify 'Unused Dependencies' would be highly beneficial for developers, helping to prevent indirect cyclic references and reducing the overall size of the module.

OutSystems is not really a front-end friend, it's more like a distant cousin when comparing it with other low-code platforms. My idea is to have a way to retrieve a specific folder from the project to our local machines / laptop similar to how Github works. Using a fetch command we would retrieve the files to a local directory on our laptop. This would give us access directly to implement our own front-end development workflows such as using Visual Studio Code do work with other tools such as TypeScript or SASS. Using a commit/publish/push command would allow us to update specific files/folders to the OutSystems Server with the code to use on the project. All the compiling would be done on our local machine. This would also allow front-end developers to integrate tools such as Grunt to automate processes and speed up our workflows.

When we have a complex SQL object with multiple parameters and something goes wrong is difficult to find which parameter is the problem.It would be fantastic during debugging can execute an SQL object parameter by parameter.It would make it very easy to find an exception for example that is occurring in the SQL object without the need to separate the parameters where I think the problem is.

 TL;DR: Add an option to redirect to Aggregate / DataFetch 's "On After Fetch" when right clicking on it.In React apps, when we are looking into an aggregate, we don't have a quick way to directly go to its OnAfterFetch action, and looking by the name in more complex screens in not very handy.My suggestion would be to have add an option, when we right click, to assist on this like we have for inputs and OnChange.

The exam application for Outsystems certifications doesn't have a time countdown.Since it's made inside the ProctorU's "SecureBrowser", you never know when it will end, because the application hides the system clock.Since you're not allowed to use a smartphone, you either have a watch or you're on your own figuring it out by the sun position.This greatly increases anxiety, examinees easily loose track of time.