While taking some course, I think it would be a good idea to have the possibility to "Flag" any lesson we think it's important enough to revisit in the future.

While looking at logs for my Android app I discovered the following: W/PluginManager(31282): THREAD WARNING: exec() call to OSAuth.startFlow blocked the main thread for 106ms. Plugin should use CordovaInterface.getThreadPool(). OSAuth is a plugin managed by OutSystems that is automatically bundled with mobile apps. It seems like there is an implementation problem that affects performance by blocking the main thread (and therefore blocking rendering). This is visible in SSO flows where UI becomes briefly unresponsive. Could this be improved?

The idea is to allow users to directly create a Light Process in Service Studio, without having to create a Process and then go to Service Center to enable Light Processes.This could be done by simply creating a separate folder from the Processes, named Light Processes, and we would then have validations in place just for Light Processes (e.g. no more than 1 activity).Additional to this idea, it would be nice to be able to launch Light Processes without having to link it to a database create event, and just launch it normally as we can do for BPT.

Hi,I have one simple idea, which is adding a feature to make the Form disabled/enabled all together at once in stead of going input by input and disable/enable everyone alone, this use case raised for me many times, and I think many Outsystems developers saw it too.Regards,Sirajeddine

Hi,I'm not sure if this was suggested as I didnt' find anything recent about this, but please give us the option to order all local variables alphabetically. I'm sure it's a "simple" thing to implement given it already happens on client actions and sometimes we have lots of local variables and makes no sense to be looking for it, when it could be sorted.

 It would be very handy to have tab like interface (like Visual Studio) to quickly switch between the differrent screens, actions, flows instead of double clicking every time you need to be there. This creates a beter overview during development.

Hi,We work in a highly regulated industry and have an on-premise installation of OutSystems. It seems unlikely in an environment like this, any security department would open firewall connections and allow probes to send (unknown) data outside the organisation.Because of this, it would be wonderful if there could be an on-premise version of AI Mentor.I understand that this might lag behind the cloud version, but a version that got updated every month say would be very helpfulThanksRichard

We work on a development server, create solutions there and then upload them to the production environment where it will be published.In coming time we will install an QA/Test server between dev and prod server. This server will also need a solution upload and publishing.It would be nice if there was a little more automation for this. I am thinking about the possibility to have 1 place where you can manage all the solutions (not and dev and prod and qa server).Also, it would be very handy if the solution delivery could be time based. So we could set a timer to create and deliver a solution on 2000 or 0100hr.Lastly it would be very nice if this automation tool had an email system within it that delivers an email about the progress or errors of a delivery.Thus what I want is:- 1 tool for all solution deliveries- possibility to set time for delivery- have feedback about the status of the delivery

Whenever I use raise exception widget, I am able to enter the exception message, but I couldn't edit exception name. It would be good if platform allow developers to enter exception name directly here instead of renaming under exception folder. It will increase readability

Solutions are great way to refresh dependencies and to deploy to another environment, and on our project we use them often. But maintaining them is not easy. I think some improvements would be great:1. Possibility to clone a solution - if you need to have another one with few components removed or added, but don't want to add everything from scratch.2. Possibility to associate many components at once. Ideally to have a list of all modules where you can check/uncheck them. This will be so much better than current auto-complete to add only one (with waiting for submit to reload the page).3. Automatic read-only solution with all user modules (no system components), which you can publish, create version and download as normal.