Ideas
10885ideas
Created on 12 Mar 2024
2024-05-02 09-49-04
Murali Manoharan V
Hi Team Currently we have option to navigate to the source's place from multilingual translation window by clicking on the icon It's better to have option for navigating to Translation window from source's place when right clicking on it Regards Murali
173
Views
0
Comments
New
Service Studio
Created on 11 Nov 2016
2021-07-07 13-36-32
Hans Dollen
It would be nice if I can use the ListAppend/Insert, and just select the variables to create a record, so I don't need to define the record first, assign values and than use the listAppend/Insert.
6868
Views
17
Comments
Implemented
Builtin & User functions
Development Environment 11.0.109.0
Created on 26 Sep 2019
2026-04-16 20-30-57
Wilbert Carpi Silva
It would be interesting to allow the importation of several files and folders, suggesting as Target Directory the very structure indicated in the import.
775
Views
19
Comments
New
Service Studio
Created on 21 Mar 2020
2023-12-07 07-51-40
Remco Dekkinga
When a country goes into lock-down, a lot of areas need to be secured by security personnel. The security branch is currently not organized enough to handle this centrally.We would like to build a portal where security personnel (and companies) can subscribe to projects (areas that need security) in order to keep a whole country safe during lock-down.
1236
Views
6
Comments
Implemented
COVID-19
Created on 26 Feb 2019
2021-03-24 17-29-38
Frederico Sousa
Hello,A lot of OutSystems customers get confused regarding our Teams being Application Teams instead of User teams, and one scenario that they get confused with is that when they have multiple businesses/independent teams working inside the same infrastructure, they can't allow the users to create applications only inside their teams.The use case is that you have multiple independent teams working in your infrastructure, and you want them to be "somewhat" autonomous, but then in Lifetime you only really have 2 options:Give them permission to change and deploy as default so that they can create applications in your infrastructure, which means that they will have access to any application that they are not restricted to (Applications that are not on a team, which if you have many teams all creating applications, and they are all created without a team at first, will be a problem unless they have a very good internal process). And if you do this you still need to give someone access to assign the applications to your team, and you need to give them "Manage Teams and Application Roles" as default, and from the moment you do that, they can freely unassign/assign any user/application to any team, so in theory they have access to everything (since they can give themselves access to anything by unassigning an app from a team). So there's either no full autonomy or no full independence between the teams.Don't give them permissions to change and deploy as default and direct to some kind of infrastructure manager that responsibility, removing the autonomy from your developer teams since they always need to raise a ticket/ask the infra manager to create an app and assign it to one of the teams that they can actually change.So as you can see, as far as I know, there's no real workaround for this use case.In my opinion, one way of fixing this without creating a new permission layer would be a dropdown inside Service Studio when you are creating an application so that you could choose the "Application Teams" that you have Change & Deploy in and then allowing the users to create applications as long as they have Change & Deploy in at least one team and automatically assign the app to that team. The dropdown could include "No Team" if the user has Change & Deploy as default.The other option would be a new permission layer for user groups, which would mean being able to group your users (one user to only one team at any time), and then giving them permissions to applications assigned to that team (like the opposite of the Application Teams right now) would fix this issue, since then you could have List as default and change and deploy in your User Group, and all applications that you would create could be automatically assigned to your User Group.I hope the idea is clear enough, sorry for this wall of text!Thank you in advance!
1972
Views
7
Comments
Implemented
Lifetime
Created on 06 Apr 2023
UserImage.jpg
Raj Sharma
Since Outsystems become very popular now a days, we should have the hard copy of Outsystems book and softcopy of the Outsystems books, book can be on separate Roles and Topic. Developers like me who are very conformable in reading books can buys these book from any platform Amazon or Outsystems portal.Developers, academic students can be benefited.This is very common thing among many programming languages like Java, .Net and many more.Like we have Head First Java, Spring MVC, Spring boot, Books on C# etc.Endorse by Outsystems will be more valuable
265
Views
10
Comments
New
Documentation
Created on 28 Oct 2016
UserImage.jpg
Kam
Adding Windows Mobile 10 support for OutSystem Now(verison10) and Native App capability.OutSystems 9 has some support for windows mobile 8.1 (mentioned on OutSystems website) and windows mobile 10 (tested by me), but this has not been taken across to the latest Outsystems release, version 10.This has been confirmed by OutSystem Support team:"As for Windows Mobile 10 support, currently it is not supported as a native app, but you can propose that on our Ideas [2]page"
1387
Views
3
Comments
Out of scope
Mobile
Created on 17 Oct 2025
2026-01-23 11-38-55
Dinesh Murugan
It would be great to have a small “Neo Insights” section within our forum profile. This section could display how often Neo has helped us, its response accuracy, and even suggest learning materials based on our previous questions. It would make Neo feel more like a personal learning assistant that evolves alongside each developer’s journey.
69
Views
0
Comments
New
Forums
Created on 17 Apr 2025
2023-08-18 10-40-36
Deepak M
Currently, the built-in "List Clear" (both client and server) action only allows a single list input. When we need to clear multiple lists in the same logic flow, we have to call the action repeatedly for each list, which results in repetitive code and reduced readability. It would be a great enhancement if the "List Clear" action could accept multiple list inputs (like a list of lists or as variadic parameters) and clear them all in one go. This would reduce unnecessary duplicated calls and streamline logic implementation, especially in complex flows. This enhancement would improve developer productivity, reduce redundancy, enhance code readability, save time in complex flows, and make applications more maintainable.
100
Views
0
Comments
New
Service Studio
Created on 04 May 2023
2026-03-10 13-44-16
Carolina Oliveira
Sometimes I feel the need to work with indexes of lists in assigns and it would be nice if I could expand expression editor on the first element in a assign.Every time I need to do this, I must use the second element of the assign to use the expression editor and copy paste to the first one.To do something like this: MyList[index].record = 3
157
Views
0
Comments
New
Service Studio
1091 to 1100 of 10885 records
Top Idea Creators
High Five to the top 5 idea creators in the last 30 days
2026-03-13 16-36-56
5 ideas
Top Brainstormers
High Five to the top 5 brainstormers in the last 30 days
2021-09-06 15-09-53
8 comments
2
2024-07-05 14-16-55
6 comments
3
2025-09-02 13-37-45
5 comments
4
2020-04-17 08-41-30
4 comments
5
UserImage.jpg
3 comments
Code of Conduct 
The guidelines we live by that make
this Community amazing!
Code of Conduct
Stay Up-To-Date
Keep on top of what's happening in the Developer Community.
Forum, Forge, Training, Documentation, and more!