We need some kind of Global Variable for Mobile apps to store Session Data that can be shared across multiple screens. I tried using a Local entity but it appears you can use Local Aggregates in Client Functions.

Hi Team, We have like and unlike option in the forum. There is no issue if someone dislikes someone's solution or post but how is that person going to know why it is disliked? if this option has transparency, we can ask that particular person for the feedback what's the issue with their solution or post. Regards, Pankaj Pant

Hi, I recently lost a lot of time when implementing an API as the top level node does not highlight an error when you include a / at the end of your base url. At the method level when you do not include a / at the start of the url path it tells you that a / is required at the start. When the baseurl and method are concatenated you end up with an extra // which results in the incorrect URL. It's quite difficult to spot. Please can you add some validation to the API node where a baseURL is added to flag if a user incorrectly adds a forward slash / at the end. I can't be the only one that has been caught out by this. Thanks John

I would like to have the ability to work off line with out having to upload the file for Intellectual Property.  In doing this I would run off of my local community edition, but later be able to change the server back to the development server when I have a connection again.

I think it would be usefull if we could add comments to flow elements, like IFs, switchs and foreachs.Sometimes the comment component is big and it's hard to position in a place where won't overlap other elements.This idea ( https://www.outsystems.com/ideas/346/%5bServiceStudio%5d+add+comment+to+value+assign?IsFromAdvancedSearch=True ) helps a lot, allowing us to add coment to the expression, but it would be easier to read and find this comments if there was a property in element to input some comments.Cheers

One of the advantages of taking online courses is that a user can do it at its own pace. In the trainings a user is now seeing a warning in case he did not stay in the item page for the time it was 'designed': "Hey! Please take some time to go through the content in the page, if not, we can't say you've completed it!". And if he is not in the page for more than that time, the item will not be marked as completed. The time a page is open doesn't reflect if the user read it. This metric to mark something as complete should be removed. There are users that need less time to read than others, and in some cases there is irrelevant information or information already known. But the training should not force a user to have the window open just for the time to pass. The mandatory time might make people to go to other pages till it passes, losing focus. Like as other companies do in their online training, time should not be the factor to mark as completed. A quiz at the end of each topic/chapter can help with the metrics, repeatable till a user passes it.

Improve the filters in the Application's screen: Separate the actual filter ("search applications by name or team") into 2 filters: Application Name Team Name Create a new filter to search for a module name.

Hi,Today, to create a new grouped attribute, you need to open an attribute menu in order to do it, while to add a new attribute ( not   grouped ), you have a column at the end of the aggregate:The "Add new attribute" in a context menu is not intuitive, and is not coherent with the most used "New Attribute" column.I would like to see the same behavior: A column at the end of the Grouped section with a New Group Attribute. It would be more intuitive, and would be the same behaviour we alread have in the filters, where an Add Group Filter appears when you have a grouped attribute.

It would be nice to be able to choose several (not necessarily all) results of a Find, and replace only the selected ones

Hello everybody,Just like the title says.It would be great if, when we choose the Database type in an image widget, we could fill a "mime type" property (of type text) using an expression. This parameter shouldn't be mandatory in order to allow backwards compatibility.The behavior would be:- If mime type = "" then the platform does its "guessing game" like it does now;- if mime type is <> "" then the platform will use this as the mime type for the image to render;This way we can control the rendering if we know the exact mime type of the image, which we usually do since it's good practice to store it in the database. this will avoid issues with svg files not being rendered correctly and forcing us to use "external type" on the image.